Man, I should blog more.
Anyway, here's an awesome quote (http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2008/arch08/081121consensus.htm):
"Because the force of gravity, and therefore its energy, is directly related to mass, the floods of energy require enormities of mass."
This is discussing the fundamental nature of galactic gravity, and the main problem I've always had with it, even as a layman. Einstein always said that he could be wrong, and was emphatic that he never finished his work, and that the extrapolations he did never worked out properly. If they did he would have come up with the Theory of Everything. Astrophysics, in particular, is a field where wrong assumptions and mislead theories have gone unchallenged for almost a full generation. This makes virtually all of the current astrophysicists slaves to Einstein's incomplete work. I wonder when the evidence dam will break and kids will no longer be taught about Black Holes and Pulsars and whatnot.
It is this type of thinking that led to the black hole hypothesis- in order for there to be such force that is observed around a Black Hole, there must be equivalent mass to generate it. However, the amount of mass necessary to generate the forces observed couldn't fit into the space of a Black Hole, so astrophysicists decided that in the special case of Black Holes, matter has no volume. Given that the EUT offers a far better, testable and observable explanation, it really is fascinating that no mainstream publication is willing to hear it.
No comments:
Post a Comment